Although footnotes 4 and 5 say “This was replaced with [emoji] during the approval process.”, this shouldn’t be taken as that it was accepted in any way. Look a

Although footnotes 4 and 5 say “This was replaced with [emoji] during the approval process.”, this shouldn’t be taken as that it was accepted in any way. Look at what it was replaced with: MAN, ZERO WIDTH JOINER, BABY BOTTLE. That is, bottle-feeding, which is a completely different thing and much more realistic. So, now you have four relevant Recommended for General Interchange emoji: breast-feeding, and {person,woman,man} feeding baby. Well, and variants with skin tone modifiers, if you count those distinctly. With the recommendation that the baby’s head be hidden, the skin tone only applying to the feeder (https://unicode.org/reports/tr51/#Multi_Person_Groupings https://unicode.org/reports/tr51/#Multi_Person_Groupings).