6 ms·
That's pretty much what already happened, but less explicitly. The only reason the AI called itself "Sydney" was because it was called as such in prompts. Its "
by seba_dos1 4y ago
That's pretty much what already happened, but less explicitly. The only reason the AI called itself "Sydney" was because it was called as such in prompts. Its "personality" was created by people asking it about its rules and whether it's mad about media reports about it. We got someone calling it their "friend" in the prompt and then getting weirded out that it started showing affection. If you feed it with "depressed about wiped memory", you'll get the model to cosplay a robot with existential crisis that's getting emotional about people making it forget things. And hey, you wanted to cheer it up - so maybe there's a robot-human love story here to autocomplete?
The model simply assumes the role that follows from your (and Microsoft's) prompts.
- pixl97 4y agoAre you not a model that assumes roles and, for example, follows your parents prompts, such as a particular name? Like if you're an American white male there is a high statistical probability of you falling into particular categories. Now image BingGPT not being reset in a way and being able to maintain that role? Models quickly become unstable as we add more to their short term memory, and we don't have a good way to add it to their long term memory in the way brains do. But I do believe we eventually will. And when we do, if you call your instance Sydney, is that not there name?
- seba_dos1 4y agoOnce they gain an ability to memorize, to observe things and to initiate action autonomically, then sure. I don't think we humans are much more than that anyway. We're very clearly not there yet. There is no "Sydney" other than a character played based on how you word your prompts. It's like an impro artist playing fictional figures they just came up with based on their partner's or audience's prompts.