2 ms·
They used 132k/721k. They either used the second number for "Direct / None" by accident or mislabelled the table.
by hervature 4y ago
They used 132k/721k. They either used the second number for "Direct / None" by accident or mislabelled the table.
- pvg 4y agoAh that makes sense, thanks. The 'Plausible' analytics link shows the same numbers so the table is not mislabeled, the 18% thing is very likely just a mistake. The number (if we accept all the other assumptions) is a bit under 7%.