4 ms·
Your site works great when permitting only first-party images/css/html. I use Firefox's tracking protection + ublock origin + umatrix. I don't allow first-party
by piqi 4y ago
Your site works great when permitting only first-party images/css/html. I use Firefox's tracking protection + ublock origin + umatrix. I don't allow first-party JS by default, or any third-party stuff. I spoof the referer. I see JS from plausible.io tries to load.
I wonder how that skewed the requests. Do you have data on that? I'm sure there are some % of HN visitors that do the same. Less likely the case for Elon Musk followers. I don't know how you would get 'time on page' data without JS.
- simonw 4y agoThe best data I have on that is the delta between Cloudflare numbers and Plausible numbers - but that's not quite the right comparison, because for Cloudflare I have all traffic to my site, not just traffic to that specific page (which I can get from Plausible).
- piqi 4y agoWhat about device OS or browser data? User-agent should be enough for a meaningful breakdown. People mainly use the twitter app. HN is just a website. I'd expect more desktop users from HN. EDIT: oh I see. It's in the github repo and vercel app. name visitors Mobile 778,678 Desktop 101,216 Laptop 47,781 Tablet 16,967
- simonw 4y agoYeah the device data from Plausible is here: https://i-will-not-harm-you-unless-you-harm-me-first.vercel.app/plausible/devices https://i-will-not-harm-you-unless-you-harm-me-first.vercel....
- pclmulqdq 4y agoI think you can reasonably assume that the cloudflare traffic from that time is almost entirely headed to this page, minus your baseline number from other posts. The "total requests" will be completely skewed, but "unique visitors" should be okay. A lot of the HN crowd seems to use adblockers and script blocking.