3 ms·
> That's factually wrong. If you decide to utterly obliterate something, the future can't find it interesting. Object X may be deleted but did you make sure al
by tenebrisalietum 4y ago
> That's factually wrong. If you decide to utterly obliterate something, the future can't find it interesting.
Object X may be deleted but did you make sure all references to X were deleted as well?
The future may become interested in something it suspects did exist, but no longer does.
Unlike a programming language, humanity may try to reconstruct the missing X.
- tablespoon 4y ago>> That's factually wrong. If you decide to utterly obliterate something, the future can't find it interesting. > Object X may be deleted but did you make sure all references to X were deleted as well? IMHO, something with references to it isn't utterly obliterated. But there are a lot of things with little-to-no references to them, and those are things someone can totally decide to make the future uninterested in.