> Someone has already incorporated this into the wiki entry for historical development of gravitational theory, which may or may not be entirely justified: > ht

> Someone has already incorporated this into the wiki entry for historical development of gravitational theory, which may or may not be entirely justified: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_gravitational_theor https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_gravitational_theor... Isn't that a core problem with Wikipedia? I don't understand why its reputation on HN improved, a few years ago, from 'infotainment but a symbol of mis-/disinformation' to 'source of truth'.