> ChatGPT is unlikely to ever come close to human capabilities: its technical design, and the design of similar tools, is missing fundamental things like common

> ChatGPT is unlikely to ever come close to human capabilities: its technical design, and the design of similar tools, is missing fundamental things like common sense and symbolic reasoning > When you think of ChatGPT, don’t think of Shakespeare, think of autocomplete. Viewed in this light, ChatGPT doesn’t know anything at all. Homunculus fallacy again. Understanding isn't made of carbon, its just correlations.