Why is every company doing RTO going with a 3 day minimum? Is there zone study I wasn't aware of? It strikes me like a decision made with a gut feeling or ban

Why is every company doing RTO going with a 3 day minimum? Is there zone study I wasn't aware of? It strikes me like a decision made with a gut feeling or bandwagon-hopping rather than actual consideration. >I’m also optimistic that this shift will provide a boost for the thousands of businesses located around our urban headquarter locations in the Puget Sound, Virginia, Nashville, and the dozens of cities around the world where our employees go to the office. Our communities matter to us, and where we can play a further role in helping them recover from the challenges of the last few years, we’re excited to do so. I hate this argument. Yes, less money has been flowing into hub cities. But that money hasn't disappeared, it gets redirected into small towns where employees live. Instead of buying gas that's burned to get me to and from work, I can spend the saved cash and time to fix up things around the house. Instead of buying lunch at the closest fast food chain and eating at my desk watching YouTube, I can eat with my wife and son at my town's market. My life is so much better because of WFH. My neighborhood is benefiting from WFH (now that pandemic restrictions have been lifted). The city's revenue is not an intrinsic right. And honestly, the city where I worked neglected its residents while appealing to commuters. I lived there for a while, and dealt with the massive potholes and limited bus lines. This should've been a wake up call to focus on lifting up the people who live there. If the companies really care about helping their cities, they can donate the money they've saved on utilities. The cities could raise payroll taxes. The companies could demand I give the money I save on gas to the city. If that last one sounds unreasonable, please understand it's still a better solution than having me spend that money on gas and spend time commuting.