3 ms·
Can we get a 2019 on the title? Or was there a typo somewhere - The docs were not 'just released'. Source: https://www.businessinsider.com/epstein-giuffre-v-ma
by celdon25 4y ago
Can we get a 2019 on the title? Or was there a typo somewhere - The docs were not 'just released'.
Source: https://www.businessinsider.com/epstein-giuffre-v-maxwell-unsealed-thousands-documents-defamation-2019-8 https://www.businessinsider.com/epstein-giuffre-v-maxwell-un...
- Beefin 4y agohttps://twitter.com/vanessasierra00/status/1626301024540434432 https://twitter.com/vanessasierra00/status/16263010245404344...
- mikeyouse 4y agoBelieve it or not - people lie on Twitter all of the time to increase their engagement. The doc she's linking to was published in 2019 by the staff of business insider - you can tell since when you click on the "Related Article" link, it directs you here: https://www.businessinsider.com/epstein-giuffre-v-maxwell-unsealed-thousands-documents-defamation-2019-8 https://www.businessinsider.com/epstein-giuffre-v-maxwell-un...
- TechBro8615 4y agoDon't let it get you down OP, your website is still cool, and if you saw that tweet today then it shows you have a product capable of indexing non-OCR PDF files with little effort! That it's fake news is kinda irrelevant to your product.
- mikeyouse 4y agoRight - it would be an interesting demo without the silly "BREAKING DOCS RELEASE" angle that apparently relies on the twitter account of a realty TV star trying to gin up followers to her OnlyFans..