3 ms·
> for those who want a more stable and slow-moving evolution of the software. As I recall, Tenacity started with some significant reworking of the development
by wizzwizz4 4y ago
> for those who want a more stable and slow-moving evolution of the software.
As I recall, Tenacity started with some significant reworking of the development toolchain. But I get your point: that's not something end-users normally care about.
- btown 4y agoNot sure about Tenacity's situation, but there are certainly ways in which development toolchains can be reworked to lend themselves towards predictable performance and reliable release management!
- wizzwizz4 4y agoWhile true, this doesn't mean slow-moving evolution of the project. A project can have predictable toolchain performance and reliable release management and rewrite the whole thing every six months.