4 ms·

>As someone who thinks WFH is cancerous A bit provocative, don't you think?

• throwaway22032 4y ago
  I think that it's negative to society but that it has enough short-term desire behind it that absence of intervention it'll continue growing. Virtual interactions will replace physical interactions as time goes on because there are all of the right pressures there. For example, basically every conference now has the lazy backstop of "just go virtual". Venue fell through? Never mind reducing the size and trying to find somewhere else, just go online because then you can pretend it's not cancelled in all but name. Cancerous is a pretty accurate term for it, I think. It'll kill what it means to be human. Already has in my career, hence me leaving.
• gumballindie 4y ago
  They probably mean there’s little to no cure for it, so wfh is likely to stay.