A. Yes there’s a slight chance that it has future commercial value decades in the future, but it seems unlikely. B. Can you read Putin’s mind? Actually Invadin

A. Yes there’s a slight chance that it has future commercial value decades in the future, but it seems unlikely. B. Can you read Putin’s mind? Actually Invading Ukraine was a fantastically ill-thought endeavor, but that happened. Was Putin grossly misinformed and out of touch reality or what? But now Putin/Russia won’t do anything that certain hackernews commenters don’t think would make sense? That is an interesting take. Also Why are commenters still saying there is no potential benefit to Russia destroying it? It’s already been pointed out that there are multiple ways it could help Russia. It’s pretty easy to come up with multiple speculative ways destroying it had chances of providing more value over the next decade than doing maintenance on an unusable pipeline. Just look at how some accuse the USA of doing it while being unable to conceive that Russia could have done it. if Russia did it then that’s exactly what they wanted. Unfortunately that accusation is reserved mostly to internet pundits so that’s been a flop for Russia. Everything is speculation at the moment. Which means whoever did it at least succeeded fantastically in that regards.