Another interpretation is that Twitter made up a wholly new breed of crime to silence a political candidate they didn't like (while allowing other world leaders

Another interpretation is that Twitter made up a wholly new breed of crime to silence a political candidate they didn't like (while allowing other world leaders to openly call for genocide), bent over backwards to protect one they did like (despite the news stories being factual), accepted false accusations of Russian interference as justifications to do so despite internally knowing this was false, censored critics at the direct request of the federal government, and accepted monetary renumeration for same.