3 ms·

No, this is bad people helping bad people. You are just being apologetic to terrible behavior. Thus enabling terrible behavior. Especially since it's the same

by mola 4y ago

No, this is bad people helping bad people. You are just being apologetic to terrible behavior. Thus enabling terrible behavior. Especially since it's the same people that usually are behind "taking down" individuals with false claims. Most of us are not psychopaths, and we shouldn't normalize malignant psychopathy

blue039 4y ago
Yes, because royalty got to its position through being a self described "empathetic person". No, power is awarded to those bold enough to do what needs to be done. You'd be wise to read _The Prince_, and instead of being revolted by it, take it as a lesson in how people such as US presidents, CEOs, dictators, etc all come to power. I'm getting downvoted because people like you haven't studied history. Typical of the pseudo-intellectual I doubt you've read any books on the historical acquisition of power. If you did, you'd notice the common thread across all cultures, kingdoms, and royalty. There's a distinct difference between deliberate machiavellianism, and uncontrolled machiavellianism. The former is business, the latter is "psychopathy". I put it in quotes because you also do not have any idea what psychopathy actually is. I'm sure you go around the office calling people "nazis" and "fascists" too.
- inkcapmushroom 4y ago
  My guy, you are not going to become royalty no matter how much you lie to everyone in your life. There are many jerks who live in the gutters and prisons too, far more than ones who live like kings.
- Red_Leaves_Flyy 4y ago
  Did you pay for access to tates discord? This is the same type of demented antisocial rhetoric he uses.
from 4y ago
The article points to a handful of bad people who used this service. They do not cover the other thousands of other likely substantially less egregious cases. Yes, the way they misrepresent themselves to take down stuff is wrong and probably illegal but fundamentally I don't think someone should be effectively barred from employment forever for a mistake they made several years ago which is what happens when arrest press releases and republications of them are allowed to indefinitely be the first thing that comes up when you search someone's name. Not to mention the fact that some of the people mentioned in the article have never actually been convicted of anything but have had their name dragged through the mud anyways.

by mola 4y ago

blue039 4y ago

Yes, because royalty got to its position through being a self described "empathetic person". No, power is awarded to those bold enough to do what needs to be done. You'd be wise to read _The Prince_, and instead of being revolted by it, take it as a lesson in how people such as US presidents, CEOs, dictators, etc all come to power. I'm getting downvoted because people like you haven't studied history. Typical of the pseudo-intellectual I doubt you've read any books on the historical acquisition of power. If you did, you'd notice the common thread across all cultures, kingdoms, and royalty. There's a distinct difference between deliberate machiavellianism, and uncontrolled machiavellianism. The former is business, the latter is "psychopathy". I put it in quotes because you also do not have any idea what psychopathy actually is. I'm sure you go around the office calling people "nazis" and "fascists" too.

inkcapmushroom 4y ago
My guy, you are not going to become royalty no matter how much you lie to everyone in your life. There are many jerks who live in the gutters and prisons too, far more than ones who live like kings.
Red_Leaves_Flyy 4y ago
Did you pay for access to tates discord? This is the same type of demented antisocial rhetoric he uses.

from 4y ago

The article points to a handful of bad people who used this service. They do not cover the other thousands of other likely substantially less egregious cases. Yes, the way they misrepresent themselves to take down stuff is wrong and probably illegal but fundamentally I don't think someone should be effectively barred from employment forever for a mistake they made several years ago which is what happens when arrest press releases and republications of them are allowed to indefinitely be the first thing that comes up when you search someone's name. Not to mention the fact that some of the people mentioned in the article have never actually been convicted of anything but have had their name dragged through the mud anyways.