3 ms·
> So.. your point is CHAdeMO had a big head start and still lost out to CCS? That's a shame. This is low-effort sniping. The upthread point was that at the mo
by ajross 4y ago
> So.. your point is CHAdeMO had a big head start and still lost out to CCS? That's a shame.
This is low-effort sniping. The upthread point was that at the moment the standardization process was happening, both CHAdeMO and Tesla presented superior technologies to what the committee ended up picking. And CCS is still suffering with those limitations in comparison with Tesla's much trimmer device (CHAdeMO hasn't kept up as well, it's true).
- clouddrover 4y agoThe "superior technologies" of CHAdeMO and the Tesla plug didn't deliver the practical outcome of your choice of charger with your choice of vehicle like CCS did and continues to do: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_WjeH3I8p8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_WjeH3I8p8 It doesn't matter how "superior" you think they are. They didn't solve the business case and were dead on arrival because of that.