3 ms·
They do and in fact it's relatively straightforward to show empirically on eg MNIST. The problem is that you need a much much larger network in the FCN case and
by xmcqdpt2 4y ago
They do and in fact it's relatively straightforward to show empirically on eg MNIST. The problem is that you need a much much larger network in the FCN case and thus need way more data and way more data augmentation to get a good result that isn't overfit to hell.
In the case of CNN the reason it works is that an image of an object X is still an image of object X if the X is shifted left or right. The property is translationally invariant. CNN are basically the simplest way to encode translational invariance.
- candiodari 4y ago> CNN are basically the simplest way to encode translational invariance That's the geometric deep learning theory, isn't it? Do you know if there's a list somewhere of exactly what invariance has which ways to simulate it? Like an overview?