3 ms·
That would be great, but: - Index is only good when SEOs don't know what's inside. Buying index access assumes some level of answers given to the questions: "ho
by jerjerjer 4y ago
That would be great, but:
- Index is only good when SEOs don't know what's inside. Buying index access assumes some level of answers given to the questions: "how do you build it?", "how do you rank what's inside?". With more than one company it's very likely to be public knowledge very soon.
- Index is the secret sause of a search engine. Not sure if anyone would like to share that.
But overall I'd like to see it. Maybe some pre-index struture? Just a large db of a page metadata? So that search engines can add their ranking on top of it.
- dx034 4y agoExactly, not an index but a large database with raw html of pages. Not trivial with modern SPAs but still doable. Storage and compute cost is probably the biggest cost factor.
- Terretta 4y ago> Storage and compute cost is probably the biggest cost factor. I wonder if "not an index but a large database with raw HTML of pages" would cost less if you could get content providers to maintain a distributed cached copy of their content at their own expense?