2 ms·
Check the EULA at https://www.tampermonkey.net/eula.php https://www.tampermonkey.net/eula.php Excerpt from point 4 > 4. NON-ALLOWABLE USES OF TAMPERMONKEY >
by pmontra 4y ago
Check the EULA at https://www.tampermonkey.net/eula.php https://www.tampermonkey.net/eula.php
Excerpt from point 4
> 4. NON-ALLOWABLE USES OF TAMPERMONKEY
> You are strictly prohibited from, and agree that you will not, adapt, edit, change, modify, transform, publish, republish, distribute, or redistribute Tampermonkey or any elements, portions, or parts thereof, including without limitation, to any elements, portions, or parts of Tampermonkey software (in any form or media) without the Company’s prior written consent. [...]
- 2Gkashmiri 4y agohttps://github.com/Tampermonkey/tampermonkey/blob/master/COPYING https://github.com/Tampermonkey/tampermonkey/blob/master/COP... this says GPL so unless they update their license file here, this stays
- L3viathan 4y ago> This repository contains the source of the Tampermonkey extension up to version 2.9. All newer versions are distributed under a proprietary license. You can of course do whatever GPL allows you to the code in the repository (so up to version 2.9).
- crashmat 4y agoso the newer version isn't even at all based on the one before 2.9? seems unlikely
- tsbinz 4y agoIf you own the rights to software, you previously releasing something under the GPL does not mean you have to make derived versions of the thing you released under the GPL available under the GPL too. If you take someone else's code under the terms of the GPL you have to do that, but that does not seem to have happened here.
- dTal 4y agoThat assumes that nobody contributed to the software while it was GPL, unless there was an explicit contractual copyright transfer.
- account42 4y agoIt only assumes that there were no copyrightable contributions that weren't replaced as before the license change. Not all code changes meet the criteria for copyright.