3 ms·
I think encrypting your boot partition and kernel is not very useful. The "better" (IMO), would be to sign the kernel and use secureboot, but otherwise leave it
by chlorion 4y ago
I think encrypting your boot partition and kernel is not very useful. The "better" (IMO), would be to sign the kernel and use secureboot, but otherwise leave it unencrypted. This way the kernel and whatnot can't be tampered with and you don't have to deal with an encrypted boot partition.
I don't think there would be anything in your kernel or bootloader that needs to be confidential!
- shmerl 4y agoWell, kernel version is already some information. Whatever it gives. It's not about guessing how useful that information is. It's about minimizing it by default.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]