It is probably worth keeping in mind that since at least 2006 or so, Seymour and the truth aren't really much on speaking terms any more. If he then posts a wh

It is probably worth keeping in mind that since at least 2006 or so, Seymour and the truth aren't really much on speaking terms any more. If he then posts a whole bunch of extraordinary unverifiable claims by an unnamable source, I don't really think there's much need for rebuttals.