4 ms·

> You made numerous baseless claims without evidence in your posts. Please list them. > If you're not one of those people, you should have posted from an esta

> You made numerous baseless claims without evidence in your posts. Please list them. > If you're not one of those people, you should have posted from an established account where it wouldn't come across as yet another fresh account from a small group of people. As I've stated before the reason I'm posting under a fresh account is to protect my identity so I don't face the wrath of you and your community. You've threatened to unleash this upon people in the past [0], despite constantly claiming that you're the one being harassed and attacked. > A starting point is making a list of the posts you've made with throwaway accounts across platforms recently, showing us which ones were you and correcting the inaccurate claims you're making in them. Yet another sockpuppet accusation. I hope anyone reading this is able to filter through strcat's baseless accusations and focus on the actual arguments being presented on both sides. I'm not sure why posting the same arguments under an established account should have any significance on the validity of the arguments. You have failed to provide any evidence of anti-GrapheneOS sockpuppet accounts so far, but there actually has been clear evidence of a GrapheneOS lead developer encouraging the community to actively create sockpuppet accounts on Twitter, Reddit, and HN in order to promote GrapheneOS [1]. > People can look at our chat rooms and forums to see that this is clearly not true. I actually encourage people to do this, because it very much is true. [0] https://github.com/bromite/bromite/pull/2102#issuecomment-1155814811 https://github.com/bromite/bromite/pull/2102#issuecomment-11... [1] https://web.archive.org/web/20210913221117/https://sethforprivacy.com/posts/community-drama-and-mobile-os/ https://web.archive.org/web/20210913221117/https://sethforpr... Screenshot of the GrapheneOS Matrix room from the article: https://web.archive.org/web/20210914180603im_/https://sethforprivacy.com/community-drama-and-mobile-os/graphene_brigading.jpg https://web.archive.org/web/20210914180603im_/https://sethfo... Note that "anupritaisno1" has changed their online identity a few times and is currently going by the name "randomhydrosol". It looks like they aren't listed under the GrapheneOS GitHub organization anymore, but they are e.g. one of the administrators of the privsec.dev website that strcat linked earlier: https://privsec.dev/about https://privsec.dev/about

strcat 4y ago
> You've threatened to unleash this upon people in the past [0], despite constantly claiming that you're the one being harassed and attacked. Dishonest claim. > You have failed to provide any evidence of anti-GrapheneOS sockpuppet accounts so far, but there actually has been clear evidence of a GrapheneOS lead developer encouraging the community to actively create sockpuppet accounts on Twitter, Reddit, and HN in order to promote GrapheneOS There's rampant usage of sockpuppet accounts across platforms to harm GrapheneOS with misinformation. Your account here is one of them, and there was another. You've almost certainly made accounts elsewhere since your writing style and dishonest talking points match those from elsewhere. The level of sockpuppet account usage to harm GrapheneOS on Reddit are extreme and have been noticed by the moderators of multiple subreddits including ones with moderators who are not friendly to us but who are still dealing with this to an extent. Pretending this is not going on is silly, and the ridiculous baseless claim that we are doing it is typical behavior. That is what you are doing: making one baseless claim after another and projecting what you're doing as part of your malicious misinformation campaign onto us. > but there actually has been clear evidence of a GrapheneOS lead developer encouraging the community to actively create sockpuppet accounts on Twitter, Reddit, and HN in order to promote GrapheneOS This is a complete fabrication, along with your other fabrications. That is what you do. > Screenshot of the GrapheneOS Matrix room from the article This is similarly not accurate information, and the source of this is a malicious Copperhead employee who gave it to Techlore as part of his misinformation campaign against GrapheneOS, which was then referred to my Seth, a friend of Techlore also involved in it. As I said, a small group of malicious people has spread lots of misinformation. Sockpuppets repeat their inaccurate claims across platforms in numerous threads on a daily basis. It's a never ending assault on the project with dishonest claims and has caused substantial harm.

strcat 4y ago

> You've threatened to unleash this upon people in the past [0], despite constantly claiming that you're the one being harassed and attacked. Dishonest claim. > You have failed to provide any evidence of anti-GrapheneOS sockpuppet accounts so far, but there actually has been clear evidence of a GrapheneOS lead developer encouraging the community to actively create sockpuppet accounts on Twitter, Reddit, and HN in order to promote GrapheneOS There's rampant usage of sockpuppet accounts across platforms to harm GrapheneOS with misinformation. Your account here is one of them, and there was another. You've almost certainly made accounts elsewhere since your writing style and dishonest talking points match those from elsewhere. The level of sockpuppet account usage to harm GrapheneOS on Reddit are extreme and have been noticed by the moderators of multiple subreddits including ones with moderators who are not friendly to us but who are still dealing with this to an extent. Pretending this is not going on is silly, and the ridiculous baseless claim that we are doing it is typical behavior. That is what you are doing: making one baseless claim after another and projecting what you're doing as part of your malicious misinformation campaign onto us. > but there actually has been clear evidence of a GrapheneOS lead developer encouraging the community to actively create sockpuppet accounts on Twitter, Reddit, and HN in order to promote GrapheneOS This is a complete fabrication, along with your other fabrications. That is what you do. > Screenshot of the GrapheneOS Matrix room from the article This is similarly not accurate information, and the source of this is a malicious Copperhead employee who gave it to Techlore as part of his misinformation campaign against GrapheneOS, which was then referred to my Seth, a friend of Techlore also involved in it. As I said, a small group of malicious people has spread lots of misinformation. Sockpuppets repeat their inaccurate claims across platforms in numerous threads on a daily basis. It's a never ending assault on the project with dishonest claims and has caused substantial harm.