4 ms·
> willfully blind Nice jab. I think if you produce a novel technology and make it free then people will use it. If you feel confident that these things are "u
by kodah 4y ago
> willfully blind
Nice jab.
I think if you produce a novel technology and make it free then people will use it. If you feel confident that these things are "useful" then have people pay for it. Will they still use it for beyond entertainment then?
CoPilot, after an extensive free preview period, garnered something like 400k subscribers at $10/m. I'm curious to see where that number settles at over time. My hunch is that the things you're seeing people use ChatGPT for are more novel than useful and a lot of the value prop is that it's currently free.
To put this in context, GitHub has $1B ARR and roughly 90M active users.
- stevenhuang 4y agoHow much do you think grammarly.ai is worth. Now consider that ChatGPT is able to subsume it https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/112z2j4/i_built_a_chrome_extension_to_turn_chatgpt_into/ https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/112z2j4/i_built_a_... This is only one application among many. PS people _are_ paying for it, the premium is $20/month. So yes, you are blind on this, sad to say.