> I doubt Jens Stoltenberg was a US intelligence asset in his early teens. Actually, it seems Stoltenberg was politically active during the late years of the

> I doubt Jens Stoltenberg was a US intelligence asset in his early teens. Actually, it seems Stoltenberg was politically active during the late years of the Vietnam war, as a teenager: https://www.patreon.com/posts/unlocked-young-78471711 https://www.patreon.com/posts/unlocked-young-78471711 that doesn't mean he necessarily "worked directly with US intelligence", but - he might have. He did go on to become a staunch NATO-supporter after all. > mine clearing has long been a staple of the BALTOPS exercises. Implying that this is something that was added as cover for this operation is honestly laughable. So, an extra R&D exercise in addition to everything that was already planned. Adding something that doesn't seem extraordinary is a good idea; adding an strange exercise would seem suspicious. > Secondly, the people behind this highly secret operation that could not afford leaks had now somehow convinced the BALTOPS planners to change the parameters of their exercise Add another exercise, supposedly similar to existing exercises. > All of this either without informing them of why or by adding more people to the loop that could leak the plans. On the contrary. If this had been an isolated operation, it would have been far more likely to raise suspicions. This seems like a way to minimize the disturbances. Don't know about the ship business, it requires close scrutiny if one is not an expert on these matters and I'm certainly not. What I can say is that reporting based on anonymous sources, no material evidence, and little or no ability to otherwise verify is problematic - even if the US is the most likely suspect for blowing up Nordstream.