4 ms·

> > it lacks any safety lifecycle process > completely demonstrably false Head of AP, testified under oath, that they don't know what's Operational Design Doma

> > it lacks any safety lifecycle process > completely demonstrably false Head of AP, testified under oath, that they don't know what's Operational Design Domain. I'll just leave it at that. > > speed of pushing stuff to customers (on the order of days) > this is also false and doesn't happen Never ever Musk tweeted about .1 fixing some critical issues coming in next few days? I must live in a different timeline. > > you cannot possibly claim you can even such a basic things like proper change management (no, commit message isn’t that) or validation. > you know absolutely nothing about the internal timelines of developments and deployments at tesla and to suggest it's impossible without that knowledge is just dishonest Let's assume I have no internal information. If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck.

JoshCole 4y ago
> Never ever Musk tweeted about .1 fixing some critical issues coming in next few days? I must live in a different timeline. Lets say you have a baby which is being born. You tweet, birth in ten days! You can't then say, look: here is a tweet, it proves that baby development in tweeters actually has a several day lifecycle and moreover it proves that baby having mother's don't do proper pre-birth routines, because the tweet isn't the process that created the baby. It is separate. > If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck. Right. So the fact that we have video evidence of internal processes, including QA processes, is much more like looking, swimming, and quacking like a duck much like having video evidence of a mother with a round belly for months before the tweet would be evidence that the babies don't take weeks to develop. So when Elon has also tweeted that a launch was delayed, because of issues that were discovered - which does happen, as I'm sure you know if you follow his tweets as you imply - then that would be evidence congruent with the video evidence we have of QA processes existing within the company.

JoshCole 4y ago

> Never ever Musk tweeted about .1 fixing some critical issues coming in next few days? I must live in a different timeline. Lets say you have a baby which is being born. You tweet, birth in ten days! You can't then say, look: here is a tweet, it proves that baby development in tweeters actually has a several day lifecycle and moreover it proves that baby having mother's don't do proper pre-birth routines, because the tweet isn't the process that created the baby. It is separate. > If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck. Right. So the fact that we have video evidence of internal processes, including QA processes, is much more like looking, swimming, and quacking like a duck much like having video evidence of a mother with a round belly for months before the tweet would be evidence that the babies don't take weeks to develop. So when Elon has also tweeted that a launch was delayed, because of issues that were discovered - which does happen, as I'm sure you know if you follow his tweets as you imply - then that would be evidence congruent with the video evidence we have of QA processes existing within the company.