I think what I’m saying is that that seems problematic (and I think the things we’ve seen from ChatGPT and Bing just emphasize this). From chatting with these

I think what I’m saying is that that seems problematic (and I think the things we’ve seen from ChatGPT and Bing just emphasize this). From chatting with these models, orders of magnitude better ‘understanding’* seems necessary before they’ll be able to actually reliably follow these ‘prompts’ during end-user conversations of the kind we’re expecting them to. The prompts just can’t be precise enough, and the models can’t ‘understand’ them enough to extrapolate ‘spirit’ of the prompts as a human would (although, to be honest, I’m not sure a human could either because of the preciseness problem…). This feels like a fundamental issue to me. *I know - but if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck - that’s been a controversial tenet of AI for decades…