3 ms·
To me it's weird you can voice an opinion like "I won't use it" and then say it's nice on the highway, as if you've given it enough of a trial there to endorse
by qup 4y ago
To me it's weird you can voice an opinion like "I won't use it" and then say it's nice on the highway, as if you've given it enough of a trial there to endorse it when you think otherwise it's going to be killing people.
- CharlesW 4y agoHow is it weird that FSD might work well on extremely simple, boring stretches of road but fall apart as complexity increases?
- qup 4y agoNot that weird, it's just weird to recommend it after you've seen it almost kill you. I doubt he's put in the requisite time/miles/effort/observation/whatever to know that it does great on the highway but not elsewhere. There's solid objects on highways, too.
- helf 4y agoBecause the Tesla fans will cling to anything to further their arguments.
- bdcravens 4y agoPretty sure almost crashing into a solid object seems good enough for giving it a failing score.
- qup 4y agoI definitely agree, in which case I wouldn't find myself endorsing it for any use. Just because I drove X amount of miles without a problem on the highway doesn't mean it's any less likely to drive into a solid object, why would he recommend it?
- helf 4y agoI dunno man, according to another poster, I think FSD would probably give itself a safe driver rating of at least 85 for that.