It's not that people misunderstand the probabilistic nature of the models. It's that people are rightfully concerned about the impact of the composition of said

It's not that people misunderstand the probabilistic nature of the models. It's that people are rightfully concerned about the impact of the composition of said probabilistic loop with another one when the mechanism of said composition isn't entirely understood. You're trying to argue seesaw mechanics while everyone else is worrying about the outcome of the abstract algebra of the damn thing. You just don't realize the conversation is happening on a higher level than you're currently thinking. It's alright. Happens to everyone.