The WSJ's point, that Wikipedia has never blacked itself out on any other political issue, is factually incorrect - odd that a newspaper can't take the time to

The WSJ's point, that Wikipedia has never blacked itself out on any other political issue, is factually incorrect - odd that a newspaper can't take the time to do its research, but Wikipedia blacked out in Italy after passage of a similar law there making it responsible for user content. Oddly enough, Italy backed down as well. Wikipedia takes action when the Internet is threatened - that's just common sense. Which may be why the WSJ editorial page can't grasp it.