> (with the 1 exception being pinning posts, which arguably yes, they should be liable for) I don't believe that is the only way they promote posts, because ma

> (with the 1 exception being pinning posts, which arguably yes, they should be liable for) I don't believe that is the only way they promote posts, because many of them clearly manipulate the up/downvotes to sway where posts show up. They also randomly shadowban content (not just users) which you can see looking at a user account, but not in the discussion thread. So a particularly salient point that changes an argument is simply hidden from the rest of the discussion.