> Why do you think this is so unbelievable you need picture proof? i was refering specifically to the bit where part of the conversation was removed. it doesnt

> Why do you think this is so unbelievable you need picture proof? i was refering specifically to the bit where part of the conversation was removed. it doesnt make sense to me that it would send the "malicious"(?) reply the bot made and then censor it after the fact. describing whatever bad things the bot said there is just moot and hearsay.