5 ms·
The link should probably be to the original, cited source[0], since Schneier did not add anything except the word "Interesting" linked to yet another blog post[
by miles 4y ago
The link should probably be to the original, cited source[0], since Schneier did not add anything except the word "Interesting" linked to yet another blog post[1] discussing the original source.
[0] https://www.businessinsider.com/amazon-chatgpt-openai-warns-employees-not-share-confidential-information-microsoft-2023-1 https://www.businessinsider.com/amazon-chatgpt-openai-warns-...
[1] https://futurism.com/the-byte/amazon-begs-employees-chatgpt https://futurism.com/the-byte/amazon-begs-employees-chatgpt
- dang 4y agoOk, changed to the second URL (as the first one seems hardwalled) from https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2023/02/chatgpt-is-ingesting-corporate-secrets.html https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2023/02/chatgpt-is-in.... Thanks!
- miles 4y agoRight on - thanks Dan! Oddly, I didn't have any trouble opening the first link in Safari without any sort of bypass. Perhaps I haven't visited BI enough to trigger their paywall. Out of curiosity, do you hit the same wall in another browser or after clearing cookies/cache?
- dang 4y agoI don't hit the same wall in that case, and will try to remember that in the future. Thanks!