2 ms·
It's not, it provides stability for both employee and employer, not being able to be ruthlessly laid off when a ceo sees a dip in quarterly earnings and has to
by Avicebron 4y ago
It's not, it provides stability for both employee and employer, not being able to be ruthlessly laid off when a ceo sees a dip in quarterly earnings and has to appease the capital class pulling the strings stabilizes employees lives. Employees understanding this and engaging in it also gives the company planning room.
- carlosjobim 4y agoYou could have these protections only for the employees and not for the employers. If you as an employer have made your business completely dependent on a single employee you haven't done your job, especially if that person decides to leave suddenly.