2 ms·
Yeah - OpenAI terms of service say your inputs may be used to improve the service, so no need to make it sound like there's anything sinister going here. The c
by HarHarVeryFunny 4y ago
Yeah - OpenAI terms of service say your inputs may be used to improve the service, so no need to make it sound like there's anything sinister going here.
The company I work for - large telecom - has already issued company policy not to use it for this reason.
I'd guess later there may be non-free business versions of the tech that provide privacy guarantees, and presumably other GPT-based tools such as CoPilot already do.
- cush 4y agoAzure OpenAI is an option. There are others
- dattmavis 4y agoWe've shifted our focus to this for an internal project because the standard OpenAI privacy policy is VERY confusing and vague. It has some spots where language conflicts itself. Our corporate lawyer read over it and gave a hard "no" just because of the ambiguity of the policy. We still need to review Azure OpenAI but on the surface it's looking to be the best option for Enterprise.
- rom-antics 4y agoIt sounds like your lawyer put more effort into reading it than OpenAI put into writing it. Speaking more generally I've been surprised how many companies seem to just steal any random privacy policy they can find online to tick the box without ever giving it a second thought.
- whiterace1488 4y ago[dead]
- rsstack 4y agoIt's a bit hidden, but from the Terms of Service: "You can opt out of having Content used for improvement by contacting support@openai.com with your organization ID."
- windthrown 4y agoBut if you ran the company with the confidential information would you trust that? You would have no way of knowing if they actually honor those requests.
- rsstack 4y agoThat's always true. Dropbox employees may be browsing through customer files on their lunch break. Microsoft employees may be giggling about Microsoft 365 email contents. Both Dropbox and Microsoft are very well trusted, despite having access to confidential information, due to contracts & audits & "fame / popularity" (yes!) & long enough track record with no business-interesting scandals.