> Translation of a domain name to a dotted quad is free speech activity. Really? It isn't necessary to force every square peg of an objection into the round ho

> Translation of a domain name to a dotted quad is free speech activity. Really? It isn't necessary to force every square peg of an objection into the round hole of 1st amendment free speech rights. Even more generally, bad public policy can still be constitutional. Objections should be organized around the unsoundness of the policy in addition to any Constitutional objections. Defense in depth, so to speak.