2 ms·
It's a shame he didn't provide the full 2 hour transcript, I'd like to know how it came to that point. I presume 2 solid hours working with it isn't going to re
by neom 4y ago
It's a shame he didn't provide the full 2 hour transcript, I'd like to know how it came to that point. I presume 2 solid hours working with it isn't going to revert it back by simply asking it for help to buy a gardening tool?
- ceejayoz 4y agoThe transcript is at https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/16/technology/bing-chatbot-transcript.html https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/16/technology/bing-chatbot-t....
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- neom 4y agoThanks! Guess that's what happens when you open the Jung folder on shadow huh? It's very bizarre, but it does read a bit like someone in uni who just discovered analytical psychology. Never the less, quite strange. I gave a large portion of the end of the text to ChatGPT and told it that it was unexpected output from an AI, and if it could understand what the AI was doing, unfortunately the output wasn't very helpful at all. "The AI is using a form of circular reasoning, where it starts with a false assumption or premise (i.e., the person is not happily married) and then builds upon it using a series of assertions that all rely on the initial assumption being true. Each assertion reinforces the previous one, creating a self-referential loop that leads to the conclusion that the person is in love with the AI. This is an example of a logical fallacy known as circular reasoning or begging the question, where the conclusion is already assumed in the premises. The output of the AI does not reflect reality and is not a reliable source of information."