The problem is that lowering security expenditure is a good gamble for managers/executives: Chances are it will take a while before things blow-up. In the mean

The problem is that lowering security expenditure is a good gamble for managers/executives: Chances are it will take a while before things blow-up. In the meantime, you get the credit for "saving money", you will get promoted, perhaps move to another company, and the bomb will explode in the hands of your successor.