3 ms·
>it's easy for people who surround themselves with others who approve to forget that most of the world, even in liberal countries, still views it very negativel
by midoridensha 4y ago
>it's easy for people who surround themselves with others who approve to forget that most of the world, even in liberal countries, still views it very negatively.
Yes, but remember this happened in the United States, which is a country that recently banned abortion in many of its states. It is not at all a "liberal country", even though parts of it, and a significant part of its population, are quite liberal. In particular, the people working in jobs like customs and immigration enforcement are NOT liberal at all.
- Connor_Creegan 4y agoHow do you define "liberal"? Per my understanding, the United States and liberalism are almost synonymous. The US is basically the representative of liberalism on the world stage, at least that's how most of the world tends to think of us.
- seba_dos1 4y agoEconomically? Perhaps. Socially? You could only say that if you're cruelly joking.
- Connor_Creegan 4y agoThe two might be conceptually-separable but they tend to go hand in hand in practice. Although maybe you have some different things in mind by "socially liberal" than I do. When I think "liberal" I think the liberal vein of natural rights philosophy - Locke, Hobbes, Rousseau, Jefferson, et cetera - which implies a kind of unique anthropology in which man is no longer axiomatically communal, but first and foremost an individual without a common final end with his fellow man. This is the philosophical basis for both "economic" and "social" liberalism.
- jfengel 4y agoThe US uses "liberal" to mean "progressive". In most of the world, "liberal" means something closer to "libertarian". It generally implies an interest in laissez-faire capitalism.