> dunk on the people making insurance payments to cover his bail! It's a weird thing to decide to do! But none of it has much to do with anything fundamental ab

> dunk on the people making insurance payments to cover his bail! It's a weird thing to decide to do! But none of it has much to do with anything fundamental about the case. What makes you believe there’s no hidden connection? Why would these 2 Stanford people post bail? Do you not feel there’s something to be uncovered in SBF’s web of lies?