3 ms·
Not conclusive, but it was edited in photoshop [1], whereas the other images were not [2] [1] https://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=b98e447834ffbc36d3ae5b1
by jtsiskin 4y ago
Not conclusive, but it was edited in photoshop [1], whereas the other images were not [2]
[1] https://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=b98e447834ffbc36d3ae5b144e798d6de75ad801.361511&show=meta https://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=b98e447834ffbc36d3...
https://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=6f4b50d6f01c0018749e40fcd6ebbd4d5f4d22d7.1295032&show=meta https://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=6f4b50d6f01c001874...
- Hounddog11 4y agoDamn, all this website does is show an image file's metadata. I thought it was going to be some cool AI thing that detects whether an image is photoshopped via some kind of fancy ML model. Does such a thing exist? Is it possible?
- thrdbndndn 4y agoIt was also edited in GIMP on Mac before PS on Windows. While also not conclusive, but apparently the editings seem to be re-save only. But again, you can choose not to save (or only save some) edit histories in XMP.