[1] Federal Trade Commission (FTC) - FTC v. Innovative Marketing, Inc., the court allowed the FTC to use administrative subpoenas in a criminal case involving f

[1] Federal Trade Commission (FTC) - FTC v. Innovative Marketing, Inc., the court allowed the FTC to use administrative subpoenas in a criminal case involving fraudulent business practices. The court found that the information requested by the FTC was relevant to the criminal case and that the use of administrative subpoenas was an appropriate means of obtaining that information. [2] Department of Justice (DOJ) - In United States v. Parris, the court allowed the DOJ to use an administrative subpoena to obtain information from a bank in connection with a criminal investigation. The court found that the DOJ had the authority to issue administrative subpoenas under the Bank Secrecy Act, and that the information requested was relevant to the criminal case. [3] Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) - In the case of SEC v. Jerry T. O'Brien, the court upheld the SEC's authority to issue administrative subpoenas in connection with a criminal investigation. The court ruled that the SEC could use administrative subpoenas to obtain information that was relevant to the criminal case. [1] https://casetext.com/case/federal-trade-commission-v-innovative-marketing-inc-dmd-2009 https://casetext.com/case/federal-trade-commission-v-innovat... [2] https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/88/555/2579079/ https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/... [3] https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/467/735.html https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/467/735.html