4 ms·
The person you responded to didn't mention anything about wanting people to stop talking about it. >Prove it? Or just desperate to convince yourself? I don't
by chlorion 4y ago
The person you responded to didn't mention anything about wanting people to stop talking about it.
>Prove it? Or just desperate to convince yourself?
I don't even know how to respond to this. The people who developed the thing and actually work in the field will tell you it's not intelligent or self-aware. You can ask it yourself and it will tell you too.
Language models are not intelligent or self aware, this is an indisputable fact.
Are they impressive, useful, or just cool in general? Sure! I don't think anyone is denying that it's an incredible technological achievement, but we need to be careful and reel people in a bit, especially people who aren't tech savy.
- einpoklum 4y agoYou can't make an "appeal to authority" about whether or not it's intelligent. You need to apply a well-established objective set of criteria for intelligence, and demonstrate that it fails some of them. If it passes, then it is intelligent. You may want to read about the "Chinese Room" thought experiment: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_room https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_room
- didntreadarticl 4y agoWe dont know how self awareness works, so we're not in a position to say what has and hasnt got it
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- jodrellblank 4y ago> "You can ask it yourself and it will tell you too." That's easy to test, I asked ChatGPT and it disagreed with you. It told me that while it does not have human level intelligence, many of the things it can do require 'a certain level of intelligence' and that it's possible there are patterns 'which could be considered a form of intelligence' in it but that they would not be conisdered human level.
- bondarchuk 4y ago> it's not intelligent or self-aware. You can ask it yourself and it will tell you too. Surely you see the irony here?