3 ms·
People might wear them if it gives them an advantage over those who don't. Imagine pairing it with something like rewind.ai - you could be in argument with some
by flangola7 4y ago
People might wear them if it gives them an advantage over those who don't. Imagine pairing it with something like rewind.ai - you could be in argument with someone and have floating text suggestions of what to say, utilizing the total cumulative data of all interaction between the two of you. The other person might try to mock you for using your AI sunglasses, but they wouldn't be able to deny the fact that this is 4th time this year you've had to be late to work because they were too drunk to take the kids to school, nor would they be able to counter the optimally-persuasive arguments it would generate.
Leaving out AI integrations, APIs could be available for social media "see through my eyes" sessions by internet personalities. Overlay instructions for how to assemble a product or change a car tire. To help friends find each other in a crowded venue. It could be integrated with networked road and on-vehicle cameras to allow a driver to see around a blind urban corner, or to highlight pedestrians. It could brighten, magnify, and highlight items of importance for those with diminished eyesight. The more sensors integrated the more possibilities. Soldiers could have an infrared vision overlay and virtual laser beam pointing from their rifle barrel.
The applications are there. But it will take an org who can make it polished and accessible. Apple used to be that, I don't know if they still are.
- gattilorenz 4y ago> Imagine pairing it with something like rewind.ai - you could be in argument with someone and have floating text suggestions of what to say, utilizing the total cumulative data of all interaction between the two of you. The other person might try to mock you for using your AI sunglasses, but they wouldn't be able to deny the fact that this is 4th time this year you've had to be late to work because they were too drunk to take the kids to school, nor would they be able to counter the optimally-persuasive arguments it would generate. I hope you’re sarcastic. I don’t think we need tech to decrease the quality of real-life human interactions.
- flangola7 4y agoI don't make any claims that it is good idea. Only that it would be an appealing product for many reasons to many different kinds of people.