3 ms·
I wonder what the story is behind n=6. It fits the same simple pattern as n=2, 3, 7, 8, 14, 15, etc. but wasn’t proved until several years later than the others
by aendruk 4y ago
I wonder what the story is behind n=6. It fits the same simple pattern as n=2, 3, 7, 8, 14, 15, etc. but wasn’t proved until several years later than the others.
- neovialogistics 4y agoIt was proved optimal by Kearney and Shiu (2002) if that helps. https://www.combinatorics.org/ojs/index.php/eljc/article/view/v9i1r14 https://www.combinatorics.org/ojs/index.php/eljc/article/vie...