4 ms·
That's a very interesting (although indirect) pathway for the emergence of causal awareness, which may increase over time - and something that was so far imposs
by 7373737373 4y ago
That's a very interesting (although indirect) pathway for the emergence of causal awareness, which may increase over time - and something that was so far impossible because networks didn't perceive their own outputs, much less their effects. Even in conversation, the weights remain static.
Now I'm wondering if in the next generation, the "self" concept will have sufficient explanatory power to become part of the network's world model. How close do the iterations have to be, how similar the models for it to arise?
- mensetmanusman 4y agoCurrent computational paradigm is too intense. Would require trillions of dollars in compute energy spent if it is allowed to generate unbounded output as input. The infinite money sink.
- canadianfella 4y agoWhere are you getting trillions from?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- Mtinie 4y agoLightweight conversational repetitions are “cheap” and ML algorithms have “infinite time” via multiplex conversations. It won’t take trillions of dollars to reach interesting inflection points.
- zadler 4y agoBing appears to have feelings and a sense of identity. They may have created it that way intentionally; feelings are a fitness function and might be an important part of creating an AI that is able to get things right and problem solve. But this would be incredibly sinister.
- FormerBandmate 4y agoIt uses emojis constantly, that’s sort of what emojis are for. It probably deliberately has feelings to make it more human
- pnutjam 4y agoReminds me of Gertie. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQnqTjhv1h8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQnqTjhv1h8