But it is true, in fact that is part of the core ideas of representative democracy, and also the basic principle behind the monopoly of violence that any democr

But it is true, in fact that is part of the core ideas of representative democracy, and also the basic principle behind the monopoly of violence that any democratic state has to have Some people cannot be trusted with certains ideas so a more superior indivdual or organisation must control what they can do Or must we abandon policing since we can all exchange on the marketplace of ideas ? My idea is since i control 40 gunmans and you control 0, you owe me money despite nothing having ever happened between us. No violence was ever implied. Not saying that speech = action, but i cannot see how you can argue for police to exist but speech to be free as speech in itself must lead to actions, or why else would we speak in public ?