I don't think I'm informed enough to have a strong opinion on this topic, if anything I'd probably lean generally in the direction of reducing bail requirements

I don't think I'm informed enough to have a strong opinion on this topic, if anything I'd probably lean generally in the direction of reducing bail requirements but I do think it's important to point out: > If someone's enough of a flight risk to earn $250M bail, their position on said spectrum seems pretty clear. My understanding is that money was only one of many conditions of SBF's bail. Others included 24/7 onsite monitoring conducted by a third party at his expense. So at least in this specific case there's more to the story than just other guaranteeing the money for the cash portion of his bail.