3 ms·
Yes but the problem turns out that no matter how you define it whatever criteria you use to restrict speech will eventually become redefined to mean. "What thos
by kneebonian 4y ago
Yes but the problem turns out that no matter how you define it whatever criteria you use to restrict speech will eventually become redefined to mean. "What those in power currently dislike."
It's why the first amendment is their to recognize speech should not be limited because if it ever is, it will never stop being so.
- gizmo 4y agoThe first amendment doesn't protect literally all speech. Never has, never will. And your assertion that restrictions on speech (e.g. banning spammers) will inevitably lead to some kind of authoritarian dystopia is purely speculative.