So... His previous conditions banned him from using encrypted communication apps except Whatsapp which he could use only with monitoring software. To my techi

So... His previous conditions banned him from using encrypted communication apps except Whatsapp which he could use only with monitoring software. To my techie brain, setting up a VPN seems like an obvious breach of that since a VPN will presumably encrypt anything that passes over it (all of which is reasonably communication even if it's just communicating with Uber to request a taxi). Maybe the judge didn't understand (or fully accept) that. Maybe there is some legalise question about how specific bail conditions have to be. Either way, specifically banning vpns solves that. But i don't think it's the courts job to play whack-a-mole while SBF plays the fool. I wouldn't expect that if I got very generous conditions then broke them twice...