4 ms·
I assumed it's due to their server chips being way more efficient, powerful, and cheaper than the equivalent parts from Intel.
by vondur 4y ago
I assumed it's due to their server chips being way more efficient, powerful, and cheaper than the equivalent parts from Intel.
- neogodless 4y agoThat is not an answer to the (math) question they were asking.
- zxexz 4y agoYeah this must be it. In my experience new AMD server chips are better in pretty much any way, for most workloads. Everybody I know seems to agree. It just doesn't make economic sense to go Intel for new servers.
- vondur 4y agoI found this bit from networkworld.com: "In the server market, AMD's total market share grew from 10.7% at the start of 2022 to 17.6% at the end of the year, while Intel fell from 89.3% at the start of the year to 82.4%. Interestingly, the server chips that are selling the most aren't the newest and greatest models" Hard to tell what calculations are being used to derive the percentages. Maybe they are using dollar amounts per total spending on all chips, and server chips cost more, therefore driving the market share numbers?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]