3 ms·
Then he should be banned from using the web. Any interaction with an ssl website is an encrypted messaging application. You might not be able to say much, and y
by smaudet 4y ago
Then he should be banned from using the web. Any interaction with an ssl website is an encrypted messaging application. You might not be able to say much, and your data is almost definitely not secure, but it is def encrypted, and sending messages, and usually an application (excluding I guess static websites on https, which I guess the resolver is still an application? But have to draw the line somewhere, windows explorer accessing a bitlocker drive could be deemed an "encrypted messaging application"...
- misnome 4y agohttps doesn’t completely hide the destination, only the contents. And if he was using https to connect to a site purely for the purposes of obfuscating activity, that would probably be squashed under the same rules. If he was using an encrypted remote drive to communicate with others that would also be a breach. You can’t “well, technically” your way out of obvious breaches of clear court instructions.